Question to native English speakers
Jun. 13th, 2008 05:02 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've started to think - a bit late, I know - that maybe I ought to be more responsible about the ratings I give my fics, especially perhaps when I post things outside my private journal on comms or on ffnet (though they have their own rating system over there). But when it comes to swearwords, I still don't think I really know enough about their impact and how it affects the rating. (Nor do I know the MPAA system very well, for that matter - but I'm not expecting an indepth explanation of that.) Should anyone reading this have the inclination and patience to give me a hint, I'd be very grateful - though I understand if no-one feels like it.
For instance, I'm curious about the words "shit" (and "shitty") and "goddamn". Are they generally considered about equally strong, or is one worse than the other? If they were to appear in a fic whose language and content is otherwise all within the G rating, how high should the fic then be rated?
And what about the f-word? Does that generally mean an R-rating? Or maybe PG-13?
I am of course aware that it's very hard to give hard and fast answers on this type of question, and in any case fanfics on LJ is hardly the same as movies. But some general hints would be great, even if they can't help but be rather subjective.
For instance, I'm curious about the words "shit" (and "shitty") and "goddamn". Are they generally considered about equally strong, or is one worse than the other? If they were to appear in a fic whose language and content is otherwise all within the G rating, how high should the fic then be rated?
And what about the f-word? Does that generally mean an R-rating? Or maybe PG-13?
I am of course aware that it's very hard to give hard and fast answers on this type of question, and in any case fanfics on LJ is hardly the same as movies. But some general hints would be great, even if they can't help but be rather subjective.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 04:27 pm (UTC)Technically, Zoro and Sanji's potty-mouthed bickering should probably have an R rating if they spoke like fanon likes to portray them doing on TV. In text I think it has less impact and people tend to move over to R only if there's really a LOT of cursing, and into NC-17 only for explicit sex or violence.
I'm wondering if my perception might not be a bit off, however, as I live in Montreal, and the province of Quebec has less rigid ratings. Movies that come out in the US and the rest of Canada with R ratings (like American Pie) only get PG-13 ratings here.
Anyway, when I post my fic, I tend to do it this way (or at least I think I do, possibly my posted stuff isn't 100% following this).
G - no swearing, innuendo, or violence.
PG - innuendo, "crap"-level swearing
PG-13 - lighter but not infrequent swearing or a couple of harder words, smoochies, innuendo or fade-to-black sex. I put Zoro-Sanji bickering in the category. I honestly can't see myself rating higher than PG-13 for language purposes anyway, thus betraying my Quebec mindset, I guess!
R - not-particularly explicit but still-described sex. Moderate violence (if I ever actually wrote any)
Hard R - Um... more explicit but not full-blown porn, I guess, I don't think I've ever used this.
NC-17 - Porn :) (funnily enough it's subjective too. First time I wrote sex I rated it this. Now I know it was barely R.) or really gory violence. I think it's easier to hit NC-17 gore on film than in fic, but I've read some nasty stuff, so it can be done.
If you have a few people you can send a given piece to, you could always do a little informal survey. The consensus should be in the right ballpark.
It is subjective though, like you said. Here's the MPAA official rundown (Here's the wiki link (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_Picture_Association_of_America_film_rating_system))
G - General Audiences All ages admitted.
-No nudity, no sex, and no drugs, violence must be minimal, and there may be language that goes beyond polite conversations.
PG - Parental Guidance Suggested Some material may be inappropriate for younger children.
-There maybe some profanity and brief nudity, mild violence, or very mild drug references.
PG-13 - Parents Strongly Cautioned Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13 years old.
-May contain very strong language, nudity (non explicit), strong mildly bloody violence, or mild drug content.
R - Restricted No Children 17 or Under Without Parent or Guardian admitted.
-May contain very strong/sexual language, mild explicit nudity, strong/gory violence or strong drug content.
NC-17 - No Children 17 or Under Admitted No One 17 or Under Admitted.
-May contain very strong/sexual/offensive language, strong explicit nudity, very strong/gory/disturbing violence, or strong drug abuse.
See, none of that is really very clear either. Maybe the best way is to look at a piece and try to think if there's a minimum age below which you'd feel uncomfortable having someone read it, and rate accordingly.
Ummmm... was any of that helpful?
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:00 pm (UTC)I think "crap" and "hell" and "damn" are the more PG swears. "Ass" is PG too, I think, but "asshole" is PG-13 (weird I know). Something about "ass" still being reference to a donkey, while "asshole" definitely isn't. "Bitch" and "son of a bitch" are PG-13... though I think a lot of people will say "cunt" is automatically an R, it seems to be quite a nasty word to many people (I think that's a North American thing more than a UK thing, though). I personally don't have much issue with it, though I don't really use it or hear it much either.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:05 pm (UTC)I think "crap" and "hell" and "damn" are the more PG swears.
Oh crap, I thought they were just G.;p I shall have to remember that, and do better.
"Bitch" and "son of a bitch" are PG-13...
(nods) Yeah, I always thought "bitch" and "bastard" were pretty much stylistic equivalents.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:10 pm (UTC)I think if you posted a fic rated G and it had those words in it, no one would be up in arms :P
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:07 pm (UTC)Goddamn in normal conversation isn't as frowned upon as shitty, but for some reason the media cannot stand GODDAMN, so if there's a movie or something airing on TV that SAYS "Goddamn" they will censor out the "God." I find it rather amusing.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:18 pm (UTC)Ah, for some reason I had gotten the impression that "goddamn" was stronger than "shit". Thanks, that's quite useful to know!
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:29 pm (UTC)It's shocking to people if you say it to people that don't know you or know you that well, or if you're not in a setting that opens a floodgate of swear words. Like at work, you're not really supposed to swear, obviously, and I generally try NOT to, but when I become relaxed around coworkers that I know don't care about swearing so much, I start swearing and they honestly get shocked--because they thought I was too polite to swear.
So I mean, just like it is for your langauge I'm sure, there's times you can swear and times you can't, it's all in the context.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:38 pm (UTC)It's just that the Swedish word "skit" while in some contexts is plenty strong still doesn't really shock most people like the English word "shit" seems to do. It might not always be accepted but it wouldn't shock people either in most casual conversation between adults or, say, any type of TV entertainment except a highly serious program or a show for young children. I've heard the Japanese "kuso" is pretty similar in those respects (though what do I know? Absolutely bloody nothing.;))
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:45 pm (UTC)Kuso is like that, it means "shit" but it isn't as offensive, again, maybe it's because they don't have as many words as we do with varying degrees of acceptability? No idea hahah.
As for worrying about ratings because most Americans use the internet I wouldn't worry TOO much about it. You can get away with more on the internet than media, of course, I've ULed short fanfics to FF.N rated PG with like 3 uses of "shit" in them (thank you Sanji) and had no problems, I just put warning of swearing in the disclaimer and at least made SURE it wasn't G, because, as the other person said, that wouldn't have any swears except you could get away with like "GOD" or "CRAP" I should think.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:53 pm (UTC)I've never thought of it like that, but I do believe you're right - there's no real stylistic equivalent of 'crap' in Swedish I can think of, not with that meaning. (There is a kiddy word, but that's considered embarrassing for adults to use, though nowadays many hip young people do.)
no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-13 05:39 pm (UTC)...
Date: 2008-06-13 10:54 pm (UTC)It is always these little things which make the difference when it comes to writing and understanding stories!